COMPLEXES: the Who, the What, the Why, the When, and the Where
Complexes are great, if they're used properly. Complexes are an
absolute mess, if they're used improperly. Most people who have spent considerable time
around strength and conditioning have probably seen them applied or used them
themselves without ever really pinning them with a label. Some people don’t use
them at all and others use them entirely too
often. Today I’d like to talk a little bit about what complexes are, when they
can be best utilized, who they may/may not be best for, why they can be a great
addition to your programming, and why I think some coaches in our industry have
let their use get out of hand.
What the hell is a
complex?
First things first. The shortest definition I could give for a
complex goes something like this: A complex is a series of exercises performed
with a single piece of equipment (usually dumbbells, a barbell, or a kettle
bell) seamlessly without changing out the resistance or allowing the resistance
to leave your hands until the given sets and reps for every exercise is
completed.
What are the pros of
complexes?
There are a few things that can make complexes an awesome addition
to your strength and conditioning programs. First and foremost, they are a
great way to extend time under tension (TUT) and build mental toughness in your
athletes. I try not to get too nit picky with my strength programs, and I think
when coaches try to manipulate TUT in every single set, they’re flirting with
micromanagement. That being said, if you would like an athlete/client to “grind
out” sets that take a significant amount of time, complexes could be the way to
go. As long as an athlete/client is able to achieve acceptable technique, a
complex forces them to maintain voluntary muscle contractions and mental focus
for an extended time frame. Because of the amount of oxygen deprivation
experienced within each set, there are few applications that not only
condition, but also strengthen your athletes.
What are the cons of
complexes?
Complexes are not for everyone. There are a lot of variables
to think about before you just apply them for anybody and everybody. Some of these variables include:
- Complexes are different and cool.
- They are complex/difficult.
This again, could be listed as a pro, but
because of the complexity and difficulty of them… You guessed it, they’re used
entirely too often. Some coaches love the fact that they can make their
athletes completely exhausted in a short period of time while using some of the
most advanced exercises in the industry. The problem with that, other than a
lot of their athletes have no idea how to do most of the movements, is that
this methodology is not sustainable. Running your athlete into the dirt every
single day with complex movements might be fun for you and might even put a
smile on their coaches face (for the one session per month they watch).
Unfortunately, that coach probably hasn’t the slightest clue how to design a S
& C program, and will probably wonder why their players are all either dragging
ass or on the injured reserve by the middle of their competitive season. This
is my best explanation as to why one of the largest advocates of complexes,
CrossFit, has gained popularity, but is NOT a quality choice for the long-term
training stimulus for athletes.
- Complexes rarely leave the sagittal plane.
- How do we use complexes?
I know a lot of you are thinking, If there are so many more
cons than pros to complexes, why do you use them? Well, my logic is this: If
used in moderation with proper modifications for certain individuals, we can
manipulate the pros to outweigh the cons. As a matter of fact, if you spend
enough time thinking critically about them, you can almost completely eliminate
all the cons I listed.
I personally use complexes in weeks that would be referred
to most as “deload” weeks. I train my athletes in four week periodized training
blocks. Because I run my structured programs in 10-week blocks, that allows me
to apply at least two deload weeks and two periodized training blocks. The only issue that arises with that
schedule is sometimes my athletes perceive a deload week as an “off week.”
Unfortunately, in the privatized sector, off weeks don’t exist. It’s hard to
explain to a parent or athlete that they paid good money for them or their
athlete to stretch and foam roll an entire session. It’s just not applicable.
So what’s most important is that we take some time to deload the spinal column.
Because complexes are so long in duration, they force an athlete to use a much
lighter resistance, and as a result reduce the stress on the spinal column
while still giving us a good training stimulus.
What are some
examples?
Here is an example of a barbell complex I like to use with
my athletes during a deload week. It’s a great combination of explosive
development and lower body and upper body strength stimuli. The string goes
Traditional Deadlift/Hang Clean/Front Squat/Split Jerk/Back Squat with a rep
count of 10/5/10/5/10. This is a series of highly complex barbell movements. It
is imperative that your athlete has been exposed to ALL OF THESE MOVEMENTS
SEPERATELY BEFORE APPLYING THIS COMPLEX TO THEIR TRAINING. I performed mine
with 135 lbs. If it’s your first time attempting it, 95 lbs. might be a good
place to start. Most of my junior high athletes use between 65 and 95 lbs. 3 –
5 sets of this complex should suffice.
Here is an example of a dumbbell complex I use with my
athletes. It’s also a great combination of explosiveness, upper extremity and
lower extremity stimuli. The string of exercises goes DB Triple
Extensions/Biceps Curls/Single Leg Deadlifts/Bent Over Rows/Reverse Lunges/Push
Ups. The set and rep count was 8/10/16/8/16/10. I used 50 lb. dumbbells. I
think 30 lb. dumbbells are a good starting weight. If you are working with
non-repetitious overhead athletes, feel free to substitute the push-ups for an
overhead pressing variation. Just be aware, the most difficult part of this
complex is the ability to grip the dumbbells, so ending with an overhead press
could be sketchy. A spotter might be a good idea. You can see me add a little
drama about half way through. Trust me, give it a try and you’ll understand
why. My forearms felt like they were going to explode. 4 – 6 sets of this
complex should be adequate.
Here is my third and final example (I honestly didn’t have
any energy left to demonstrate anymore this morning) of a landmine complex I
will use with some of my athletes. The string of exercises goes Squat
Thrusts/Split Stance Landmine Press/Reverse Lunges/Bent Over Single Arm
Rows/Single Deadlifts. The rep scheme went 10/16/16/16/16. This complex can get
a little goofy because the path of the resistance is much different than what
most are used to. You can see me lose and regain my balance a couple of times.
3 – 5 sets of this complex would be plenty.
As a young strength coach I am not expecting those who use complexes on a daily basis to take my word to heart. Some people love them, some people hate them, and others use them every single day because they just don't know anything else. I hope this gives a little more insight into how to better utilize complexes in future programs.
Thanks for reading.
Caleb Heilman
"The only thing I know is i'll never know everything." - Jason Green